The new risk management professional is creative « Riskczar Corporation

The new risk management professional is creative « Riskczar Corporation.

Thought I would share with you an interesting “very short” post that I read through WordPress.

Here is the extract:  Rick Nason’s ideas about the new risk management professional. He explains how “the career in risk pendulum may have shifted and that mathematical skill may not be the competitive advantage it once was.” He continues “mathematical skill combined with creativity, artistic and humanistic skills are the portfolio of skills that are now necessary in risk management.”

Who would have ever thought you would hear the words “creativity”, “artistic” and “humanistic” next to the concept of risk.

I responded with the comment – This is exactly the theme I talk about to take the risk profession to the next evolution. Essentially we need to see the risk professional as a mash-up of quantitative methods, qualitative methods and judgement, innovation and revolutionary thinking. The professional has always been one of historical conservatism, so this is going to be a huge challenge for us all to embrace.

We are heading into truly exciting times in 2010 and beyond.

Cheers


More from the Reading Room

The Qantas privacy finding: a positive lesson in third-party oversight

A serious data breach does not automatically mean governance failed. The more important question is whether an organisation can demonstrate that it understood the risks,...

APRA’s CPS 230 Tweaks: Small Amendment, Big Governance Signal

APRA has released final targeted amendments to CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The item is current and sits within APRA’s prudential framework, so boards and risk teams should treat it as a live governance and…

“Cheap and Out of Date”, a Board-Level Resilience Question

A practical risk maturity article using a current event to test ownership, evidence, controls, challenge and decision quality.

Everyone Passed. That’s Not the Point.

APRA's inaugural System Risk Stress Test found four major banks and six super funds individually resilient, but exposed concentration risk and a super-fund liquidity mechanism that could amplify a system-wide shock.