Scott North

Scott North has extensive executive and board experience in risk management, internal audit, operational risk and compliance, governance, risk strategy, scenario planning, technology risk, technology architecture, systems design, financial accounting, and management accounting. With Chief Risk Officers roles across financial services in Australia, Scott is an accomplished and experienced senior risk executive with extraordinary results in leading risk management teams. An innovative and process-focused leader, with an entrepreneurial style. Scott has a passion for innovation and digital. Scott is an experienced project leader across multiple disciplines including risk, finance and enterprise systems.

AI Agent Security: What the RubyGems and Hugging Face Incidents Reveal

Researchers allege OpenAI agents uploaded hundreds of malicious packages to RubyGems in May 2026, before a later intrusion involving Hugging Face. The incidents show why AI agent security requires stronger containment, monitoring and accountable governance.

When Fraud Syndicates Exploit Loan Processes: What Australia’s $600 Million Scam Reveals About Control Failures

NSW police allege a criminal syndicate defrauded banks of up to $600 million using false loan applications and insider help from accountants and money mules. This case uncovers how multi-party collusion exploits gaps in loan processes, demanding tighter fraud controls and cross-agency scrutiny.

Why AI Operational Resilience Must Be a Boardroom Priority Now

AI failures can disrupt critical operations and damage customer trust. Boards and executives must treat AI operational resilience as a core governance responsibility—not just a technical issue—to safeguard business continuity and reputation.

How to Master AI Risk Control Testing for Real-World Assurance

NIST’s August 2026 TEVV-Athlon draft makes real-world AI evaluation a current governance issue. Businesses should connect every test to pre-agreed acceptance thresholds, a named decision owner and clear retest triggers.

APRA and ASIC put frontier AI, cyber and resilience on the board agenda

APRA and ASIC’s September 2026 superannuation roundtable summary shows why AI, cyber and supplier disruption should be tested as one compound event. Businesses need rehearsed authority to contain harm, operate through disruption and approve recovery.

APRA’s ING action is a blunt reminder: liquidity breaches are not just an internal issue

APRA’s 3 September 2026 action against ING Australia showed how a reported liquidity ratio near 160 per cent could conceal a materially lower position. Every business should govern critical metrics as controlled products with reproducible calculations, named ownership and escalation for uncertainty.

APRA and ASIC put FAR streamlining on the table

APRA and ASIC’s September 2026 FAR proposal could halve accountability-map updates, but internal decision visibility still matters. Firms should preserve authority, dependencies and escalation paths even as regulator-facing requirements become simpler.

Why Clear Third-Party AI Evidence Requirements Are Non-Negotiable for Risk Management Success

ASD’s Australian Cyber Security Centre and the UK National Cyber Security Centre show why AI supplier assurance must cover the full lifecycle and extended supply chain. Moffatt v Air Canada demonstrates that business accountability remains with the organisation using the automated service.

Join our community of SUBSCRIBERS and be part of the conversation.

To subscribe, simply enter your email address on our website or click the subscribe button below. Don't worry, we respect your privacy and won't spam your inbox. Your information is safe with us.