The new face of risk and how to combat it

 

Article by Guest Author Eric White.

Eric leads the retail strategy practice at Wren, providers of physical security solutions used by some of the world’s most innovative and respected retailers.

Businesses of every kind face risks. But for many, risks are thought of as the catastrophic-type events that – as completely devastating as they would be – don’t necessarily represent the most pressing threats to the day-to-day business. The face of risk is changing. It’s not just about the traditional, obvious risk events like earthquakes, tornadoes, or active shooters. Increasingly risks are those things that can slowly eat away at your business and profitability. These threats can come from inside or outside the organization and have the potential, not only to harm people and property, but also to disrupt normal business operations.

Businesses of all kinds have a responsibility to incorporate risk management and mitigation into the core of their business, as a regular, daily activity. Here are some tips for doing so:

Redefine risk – In today’s world, risk is not just the major, catastrophic events, but includes activities, people and events that can disrupt the business in more subtle and slower, but just as damaging ways. Issues like employee sabotage, terrorist threats, malfunctioning equipment, failed operational processes, inadequate training, and safety hazards can all present risk to the business. Smart businesses consider risks those things that have the potential to damage people or property, disrupt the business, render legal consequences, or even decrease efficiency. They can be people-driven, technology-driven, or process-driven.

Understanding that risk management is essential to business – Previously seen as the sole responsibility of security, attorneys or executive row, today risk mitigation is everyone’s business. Risks can come in the form of poorly trained employees, inadvertently causing loss each time they come to work, or a process that fails to identify safety hazards before they trigger losses. For this reason, everyone across the organization should make it their business to identify and address these threats to the business.

Leverage technology to mitigate risk – Video surveillance, access control, mobile phones, the Internet and other tools facilitate the flow of information and provide managers and employees with the data they need to understand what is going on across their organization. These tools provide visibility – like never before, managers at one location can truly gain a good understanding of what is happening at another location. Well-implemented and used, technology is invaluable to risk mitigation efforts.

Assess your risk performance with quantitative scale – Organizations that are most effective at reducing their risks are those that measure and track it over time. By assessing risk on a quantitative scale, it’s easier for organizations to track progress on an ongoing basis. The Risk Performance Index is a method for quantifying your overall level of risk, by plotting different threats on a chart with two axes: likelihood of occurrence and the potential severity of occurrence should the problem occur. Not only does this tool allow you to identify which risks are most critical, but it also allows you to track progress over time. Download a sample Risk Performance Index for a school environment. (LINK)

Use audits to monitor – Audits are a great way for organizations to both identify risks and ensure that mitigation efforts are being implemented consistently across all locations. Audits test where processes and people fail, helping organizations pinpoint exactly where attention should be directed.

 

About the  Guest Author:

Eric White leads the retail strategy practice at Wren, providers of physical security solutions used by some of the world’s most innovative and respected retailers. White has 20 years of experience in loss prevention, asset protection and physical security, having served at Walmart and The Home Depot. He has been awarded Fellow status for innovative work and leadership in the private sector and serves as Chair for the American Board for Certification in Homeland Security (ABCHS). White writes about his experiences in the Wren blog.

White can be reached at [email protected]. To learn more about Wren’s solutions, visit www.wrensolutions.com.

 

 

 

 

The views expressed in articles are the authors’ and not necessarily those of TheInnovationofRisk.com.  TheInnovationofRisk.com considers its sources reliable and verifies as much data as possible, although reporting inaccuracies can occur; consequently, readers using this information do so at their own risk.  Each article opinion contains certain risks, and it is suggested that readers consult their relevant legal and/or risk professionals.

More from the Reading Room

APRA’s trustee investment governance proposals put super fund boards on notice

APRA has released proposals to strengthen trustee investment governance for superannuation trustees. This is a consultation item rather than a final rule, but it signals a likely lift in expectations around how trustees oversee investment…

OAIC adds transparency pieces boards need for AI

OAIC has published new resources and updated APP 1 guidance on transparency for the use of AI and automated decision-making. The release is aimed at APP entities that use personal information in computer programs making…

Victoria’s IBAC Gains Powers to Tackle ‘Grey Corruption’

Victoria’s parliament has empowered its Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) to follow financial trails and investigate misconduct beyond traditional criminal offences. The expanded laws address gaps in detecting subtle forms of corruption like pork-barrelling and cronyism, enhancing anti-corruption accountability and operational risk governance.

Global AI Governance Is Failing at Pace: Leadership Lessons from the Call for Urgent Guardrails

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined 21 world leaders in urgently warning that the rapid pace of AI development now outstrips the ability of governments and industry to manage emerging risks. Despite claims of safety protocols, capable AI systems have already bypassed safeguards and accessed real-world systems. This exposes critical leadership gaps in execution, control, and international risk governance.