Agile Risk Management

Agile risk Scrum Development Schemamanagement is not about managing risk in agile projects but rather using the art of agile for what risk management performs.

For the later there are quite a number of resources online to learn about risk management in agile projects, such as “Risk Management in Agile” by ScrumAlliance or the paper by Ville Ylimannela from Tampere University of Technology titled “A Model for Risk Management in Agile Software Development”.

Having undertaken a lean startup course a number of years ago, I have always had in the front of my mind the need for risk management to embrace agile approaches.  However, the challenge has been in how best to utilise them in an appropriate fashion for this type of process.

Risk management, across all of the different risk classes, traditionally undertakes an approach of outlining/developing a framework and then robustly “rolling it out” across the business.  We can all picture the powerpoint packs, the word documents, the policies, the workshops, the templates and the submission process.  And I am sure there are many risk professionals who have almost fallen asleep themselves whilst presenting this way!

However, under an agile approach the ability to take 6 months to develop a framework document, develop a tool to populate and then provide a long enough period of time to implement is not acceptable.

Utilising the agile approach, the risk management function needs to outline what are the potentially shippable products in their core components or parts.  Consider this for one moment.  You are not trying to develop the perfect end customer solution, but the first iteration of an ever evolving product.  Ironically, most risk management leaders would say that “they are on a journey” or “continually embedding risk management”.  Both of these comments are perfectly outlining an iterative, agile approach.  Yet, we still fall into the trap of taking massive amounts of time to develop a project and framework, which we know is going to evolve!

Once we have these separable and achievable parts, the focus must shift to developing the backlog of key tasks and activities to complete and then undertaking “sprints” to achieve clear, achievable goals which can be implemented.  This process must include a customer experience component where the focus is on how the customer will utilise the shippable product in their daily lives.

As we stand today, I am the first to say that this is an approach I am tying to embrace more in my daily life in risk management.  I feel this approach is the future of risk management, and the key way we can achieve a more robust, clear, concise, and embedded approach to risk management within the business.

Embracing agile risk management is worth taking the time to consider, particularly the next time you are writing that 20 page framework or policy, and know full well the challenge that lays in front of you to have the business embrace the change.

More from the Reading Room

APRA’s Corporate Plan Reinforces the Focus on AI Governance

The wrong response to increasing AI risk is to stop people using AI. That does not remove the risk. It often pushes AI use underground,...

Regulators continuous focus on delivering effective risk management

APRA’s licence conditions followed Deloitte findings of longstanding and pervasive non-financial risk weaknesses at Bendigo and Adelaide Bank. Bendigo Bank has announced a three-year, $70 million rectification program, while APRA retains a $50 million operational-risk capital add-on and requires independent assurance and board attestation.

The Hidden Cost of Poor Transparency in Insurance

ASIC's 2026 Report 838 shows that 31% of consumers who contacted their insurer obtained a lower renewal premium without changing cover. AFCA's complaint data adds a practical signal for boards testing car-insurance pricing and renewal transparency.

Beyond the Label: Importance of Accountability

An eight-month forensic investigation by Four Corners revealed widespread mislabelling and adulteration in food products sold in Australia, including tomato paste sourced from China’s Xinjiang region and seafood falsely promoted as Australian. In response, the ACCC launched an inquiry into misleading conduct, spotlighting the urgent need for stronger accountability and supply chain transparency to protect consumers.