Agile Risk Management

Agile risk Scrum Development Schemamanagement is not about managing risk in agile projects but rather using the art of agile for what risk management performs.

For the later there are quite a number of resources online to learn about risk management in agile projects, such as “Risk Management in Agile” by ScrumAlliance or the paper by Ville Ylimannela from Tampere University of Technology titled “A Model for Risk Management in Agile Software Development”.

Having undertaken a lean startup course a number of years ago, I have always had in the front of my mind the need for risk management to embrace agile approaches.  However, the challenge has been in how best to utilise them in an appropriate fashion for this type of process.

Risk management, across all of the different risk classes, traditionally undertakes an approach of outlining/developing a framework and then robustly “rolling it out” across the business.  We can all picture the powerpoint packs, the word documents, the policies, the workshops, the templates and the submission process.  And I am sure there are many risk professionals who have almost fallen asleep themselves whilst presenting this way!

However, under an agile approach the ability to take 6 months to develop a framework document, develop a tool to populate and then provide a long enough period of time to implement is not acceptable.

Utilising the agile approach, the risk management function needs to outline what are the potentially shippable products in their core components or parts.  Consider this for one moment.  You are not trying to develop the perfect end customer solution, but the first iteration of an ever evolving product.  Ironically, most risk management leaders would say that “they are on a journey” or “continually embedding risk management”.  Both of these comments are perfectly outlining an iterative, agile approach.  Yet, we still fall into the trap of taking massive amounts of time to develop a project and framework, which we know is going to evolve!

Once we have these separable and achievable parts, the focus must shift to developing the backlog of key tasks and activities to complete and then undertaking “sprints” to achieve clear, achievable goals which can be implemented.  This process must include a customer experience component where the focus is on how the customer will utilise the shippable product in their daily lives.

As we stand today, I am the first to say that this is an approach I am tying to embrace more in my daily life in risk management.  I feel this approach is the future of risk management, and the key way we can achieve a more robust, clear, concise, and embedded approach to risk management within the business.

Embracing agile risk management is worth taking the time to consider, particularly the next time you are writing that 20 page framework or policy, and know full well the challenge that lays in front of you to have the business embrace the change.

More from the Reading Room

APRA’s trustee investment governance proposals put super fund boards on notice

APRA has released proposals to strengthen trustee investment governance for superannuation trustees. This is a consultation item rather than a final rule, but it signals a likely lift in expectations around how trustees oversee investment…

OAIC adds transparency pieces boards need for AI

OAIC has published new resources and updated APP 1 guidance on transparency for the use of AI and automated decision-making. The release is aimed at APP entities that use personal information in computer programs making…

Victoria’s IBAC Gains Powers to Tackle ‘Grey Corruption’

Victoria’s parliament has empowered its Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) to follow financial trails and investigate misconduct beyond traditional criminal offences. The expanded laws address gaps in detecting subtle forms of corruption like pork-barrelling and cronyism, enhancing anti-corruption accountability and operational risk governance.

Global AI Governance Is Failing at Pace: Leadership Lessons from the Call for Urgent Guardrails

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined 21 world leaders in urgently warning that the rapid pace of AI development now outstrips the ability of governments and industry to manage emerging risks. Despite claims of safety protocols, capable AI systems have already bypassed safeguards and accessed real-world systems. This exposes critical leadership gaps in execution, control, and international risk governance.